Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:20:05 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Chris H <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [RFC] Removin the old make
Message-ID:  <20150210232005.GW29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <006eaa48dacb4a495a498088d7554af3@ultimatedns.net>
References:  <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <006eaa48dacb4a495a498088d7554af3@ultimatedns.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:13:29PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:38:54 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> =
wrote
>=20
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for=
 that
> > I want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove th=
e old
> > make from base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th.
> Please note; I am not expressing any objection to it's removal.
> But would a 30-day window not be a more friendly. So as to better
> accommodate those whom will need to make the/a transition?
>=20
What transition, since 10.0 noone have fmake by default anymore? if one wan=
t to
keep using fmake he has to explicitly state it when building.

Not that I'm against a 30-day windows but that does not seems worth it.

Best regards,
Bapt

--L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iEYEARECAAYFAlTakiUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ewx6ACglQ89WgR+Z4IUxkNVqpX74ocB
874AnRLjn6Ic4AjVdFtI0uct7kdSRu27
=RUMM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--L+ytD9kXoSFEJYhc--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150210232005.GW29891>