Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:31:03 +0900 From: ARIGA Seiji <say@sfc.wide.ad.jp> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: silby@silby.com, lconrad@Go2France.com, kris@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPsec Performance (Re: Merge of KAME code) Message-ID: <20000715153103V.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007141800280.11600-100000@achilles.silby.com> References: <20000713022715E.say@decoy.sfc.keio.ac.jp> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007141800280.11600-100000@achilles.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:02:40 -0500 (CDT), Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> wrote, : > TCP STREAM TEST UDP STREAM TEST : > NONE: 60Mbps NONE: 94Mbps : > AH: 23Mbps AH: 30Mbps : > ESP: 11Mbps ESP: 11Mbps : > AH+ESP: 8Mbps AH+ESP: 9Mbps : Question. Is the time spent in the IPSec layer accounted to the user : processor, or just thrown in with kernel time? I used netperf to measure the performance of IPsec. So, I think it is accounted to the user processor. // ARIGA Seiji To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000715153103V.say>