Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:18:49 +0100 From: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Rogue -stable commits Message-ID: <20001204161849.B14511@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> In-Reply-To: <xzpelzousr7.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 04:10:36PM %2B0100 References: <200012011013.eB1ADtP66557@storm.FreeBSD.org.uk> <200012012136.eB1LahY54938@earth.backplane.com> <xzpelzousr7.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 04:10:36PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> writes: > > This happened to me to. It wasn't a big deal to rebuild the port, > > except that a month ago the port installed as 'apache' and used > > 'apache.conf', and a root in /usr/local/share/apache, and now it > > installs as 'httpd', using 'httpd.conf', and a root in /usr/local/www. > > It's been httpd.conf / /usr/local/www for as long as I can remember > (three years or more). It depended on which port you installed. For example, /usr/ports/www/apache13 would yield httpd, httpd.conf etc. However, if you used the apache13+modssl combo, it would indeed install as 'apache'. apache13+ssl again produced httpd. So, there was a clear inconsistency, but I could not decide which way has been finally agreed upon in the end and since I mostly used apache13+modssl, it did not bother me much. But I noticed the change when I rebuilt the port because of the libc version bump on -CURRENT:-) -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szeged University Szeged Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001204161849.B14511>