Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 14:02:24 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS Message-ID: <199710022002.OAA03804@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 Oct 1997 10:01:00 PDT." <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com> References: <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : > Please, not again, don't duplicate the errors of your past handling : > of this. : > : > The sequence of commits should be something that creates : > : > 2.2-STABLE (where we are today) : > 2.2.5-BETA (for while we are in BETA on the branch) : > 2.2.5-RELEASE (when you finally roll the puppy up) : > 2.2.5-STABLE (after you roll the release). : : That would be totally and utterly bogus. Why? It makes perfect sense to me. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710022002.OAA03804>