Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Aug 2002 19:27:46 -0600
From:      "Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu" <campbell@neotext.ca>
To:        hawkeyd@visi.com, Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu <campbell@neotext.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Was: Merged security patches, now SPAM
Message-ID:  <20020809012746.M17312@babayaga.neotext.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20020806192150.A23951@sheol.localdomain>
References:  <1028659081.3d50178945f68_webmail.vsi.ru@ns.sol.net> <200208061927.g76JRrN23297@sheol.localdomain> <20020806234806.M95953@babayaga.neotext.ca> <20020806192150.A23951@sheol.localdomain>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmm.  I've been thinking that the problem of spam is one of
human identity
and not a machine issue  -- an identifiable human signator of an
email is
a fairly good bet that you want to read it.   So probably a more
general
approach to reducing robo-mail would be to have standardised
hooks
to PGP in all emailers, useable by the massess.  

When email was first introduced, this should have been a
standard feature,
but for various reasons wasn't.   Authorship provides human
authority to otherwise meaningless clusters of bits.  This
application of security technology
is actually of more significance than is secrecy. 

The reason this is not a signed message is that I'm always
trying out 
web/email clients and long ago found that they don't make pgp 
integration easy in all of them.  Interestingly, I am currently
using 
a thing called Openwebmail, which is descended from something
called Neomail.  The first pc<unix> mail client I built was
called 
neomail, and from its inception, contained full pgp integration.
Which, I might add, made a lot of folks unhappy at the time.  

To wax philosophic, I'd have to say that SPAM is Murphy's 
revenge for an unfinished implementation.

Duncan Patton a Campbell is Duibh ;-)

---------- Original Message -----------
From: D J Hawkey Jr <hawkeyd@visi.com>
To: Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu <campbell@neotext.ca>
Sent: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 19:21:50 -0500
Subject: Re: Merged security patches for 4.3-RELEASE

> On Aug 06, at 05:48 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell is 
> Dhu wrote:
> > 
> > Spamset Faraway???  Keeps out all that nasty spam from the
> > Viking probe,
> > I guess.
> > 
> > Duncan Patton a Campbell is Duibh ;-)
> 
> Am I supposed to understand any of this? Does it have 
> anything to do with FreeBSD security issues?
> 
> Or shall I see to it I shan't see you again?
> 
> > ---------- Original Message -----------
> > From: hawkeyd@visi.com (D J Hawkey Jr)
> > To: oleg@vsi.ru, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
> > Sent: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 14:27:53 -0500 (CDT)
> > Subject: Re: Merged security patches for 4.3-RELEASE
> > 
> > > In article 
> > > <1028659081.3d50178945f68_webmail.vsi.ru@ns.sol.net>, 	
> > > oleg@vsi.ru writes:
> > > > Цитирую Bob K <melange@yip.org>:
> > > > 
> > > >> > Does the FreeBSD community concerned with these
"merged"
> > and tested
> > > >> patches ?
> > > >> > Since I forced to merge these (and all new) security
> > patches to 4.0
> > > >> and 4.3, I
> > > >> > always can grant them to FreeBSD community.
> > > >>
> > > >> Whether or not they get merged in with the older
security
> > branches,
> > > >> perhaps you could combine your resources with these
guys?
> > > >>
> > > >> http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/freebsd-backports.html
> > > > 
> > > > All right, I just wrote e-mail to hawkeyd@visi.com, and
it
> > was rejected by odd
> > > > antispam filter. Does anybody know how to contact with
this
> > person ? Can I see
> > > > him there, for example ? It seems that his antispam
filter
> > passion (see link on
> > > > his page) plays poor joke with him ;-)
> > > 
> > > No, SpamFilters isn't playing any joke - SpamAssassin 
> > > flagged your mail with "CHARSET_FARAWAY", meaning it 
> > > isn't something I'm able to read (supposedly), so 
> > > SpamFilters rejected it accordingly.
> > > 
> > > I've lifted that particular SpamAssassin status, if 
> > > you wish to try again.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for thinking of me and my FreeBSD Backports 
> > > page though! Dave
> > > 
> > > PS, I didn't know anyone here knew I had put up 
> > > SpamFilters! Yes, spam has become passion of mine.
> > > 
> > ------- End of Original Message -------
------- End of Original Message -------

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020809012746.M17312>