Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:41:17 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on AMD Epyc boards Message-ID: <03042d50-610f-2614-1495-430f5f88434b@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <20180214081553.GF89804@home.opsec.eu> References: <8037bf98-acc8-6981-d25b-3b58330dbd33@sentex.net> <20180214081553.GF89804@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/14/2018 3:15 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz. > Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores > with 3.x GHz ? jail server. Lots of processes ---Mike > -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 x203 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?03042d50-610f-2614-1495-430f5f88434b>