Date: 26 Jun 2000 10:30:01 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp -o xxx Message-ID: <xzpu2eg26ba.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Warner Losh's message of "Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:34:24 -0600" References: <200006260434.WAA16059@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh <imp@village.org> writes: > fetch supports using -o to secify the output filename. However, ftp > doesn't. Since fetch won't work with socks, I've been using ftp for > all my fetching needs with ports for the past several years. Now, > I've run into snag. Some ports fetch stuff into subdirectories using > -o, so I was thinking of adding this to ftp. Comments? Wouldn't it be better to add socks support to fetch(1)? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu2eg26ba.fsf>