Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:57:19 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: per-device sysctls Message-ID: <20040226.125719.01017771.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpllmpk6ds.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <xzpptc1k77y.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040226.115049.97364862.imp@bsdimp.com> <xzpllmpk6ds.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <xzpllmpk6ds.fsf@dwp.des.no>
des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: > des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
: > : It should be a simple matter to reimplement devinfo(8) to use the=
dev
: > : sysctl tree. Does anything else than devinfo(8) use devinfo(3)?
: > I don't think that anything else does use it. However, devctl is
: > closely related and is used by devd.
: =
: I don't see any reason to modify or remove devctl....
I don't see any reason to have two almost similar things in the tree
when one will do.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040226.125719.01017771.imp>