Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:52:19 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> To: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de> Cc: "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn-cur Message-ID: <505E4F33.9060006@missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <20120922094319.GA55036@curry.linta.de> References: <4EF55B2B.9010700@missouri.edu> <20120921044729.GA47944@curry.linta.de> <505C6570.8060801@missouri.edu> <20120922094319.GA55036@curry.linta.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 09/22/2012 04:43 AM, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote: > > Dear Stephen, > >> Can you think of a way that ctm_rmail would work in both instances >> (check both for 4 and 5 digit numbers, and check gz and xz)? I think >> that is what is needed if the tool is to be universal. > > yes, you're right. One should take care of all cases. See a new version of > the patch attached. > > Best, > Klaus > Do you mind if I put your patch on the CTM ftp sites? I'll attribute it to you. I should add, I haven't tested them myself, but I trust that you did a good job. I don't use ctm_ramil myself. The only change I will make is to the path names in the first two lines patch, so that it can be applied the same way as my patches.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?505E4F33.9060006>