Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:29:31 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au> Cc: Mohammad Nayyer Zubair <mzubair@ic.sunysb.edu> Subject: Re: ideas about a unioning file system Message-ID: <3EF7EFCB.4A4BACB8@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.SOL.4.56.0306191803340.16978@sparky.ic.sunysb.edu> <1056423804.48266.54.camel@gurney.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Reilly wrote: > On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 08:15, Mohammad Nayyer Zubair wrote: > > Has anyone extensively used freebsd unionfs? From a system/network > > administrator or from a kernel developer standpoint, what do you like > > about it and what you dont like about it? > > I'm using unionfs thusly: > > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump > /dev/vinum/vinum0 /usr ufs rw,union 0 > 2 Actually, this is the union mount option, which isn't the same thing as unionfs. > > Out of the previous efforts at a unioning file system like the Sun's TFS, > > 3DFS, Plan 9 and FreeBSD unionfs itself, which fs do you think came close > > to an ideal unioning file system? > > What's wrong with the one that we have? It's a mount option, not a file system. 8-). -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EF7EFCB.4A4BACB8>