Date: 18 Dec 2000 14:31:21 +0100 From: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/libkern strlcat.c strlcpy.c src/sys/sys libkern.h src/sys/conf files Message-ID: <5l66khluty.fsf@assaris.sics.se> In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "18 Dec 2000 11:39:54 %2B0100" References: <200012180408.eBI48wg99879@freefall.freebsd.org> <xzpu282ypvp.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes:
> Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > Log:
> > add strlcpy and strlcat to kernel
>
> Please back this out
backed out.
> and think about how you can implement strlcat() and strlcpy() in
> much less code
Is that really something worth optimizing? And isn't it worth
something having the same implementation of these functions as in libc?
> and avoid duplicating strcat() and strcpy(), as I already pointed
> out on -arch.
static __inline char *
strcat(char *dst, const char *src)
{
return (strlcat(dst, src, UINT_MAX));
}
static __inline char *
strcpy(char *dst, const char *dst)
{
return (strlcpy(dst, src, UINT_MAX));
}
But that's an API change for kernel modules and something that should
be decided on doing before burning the bring.
/assar
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5l66khluty.fsf>