Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 01:53:11 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@jhome.DIALix.COM> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts bin-install.sh Message-ID: <22917.821094791@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jan 1996 16:44:47 %2B0800." <Pine.BSF.3.91.960108162944.496A-100000@jhome.DIALix.COM>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > 2.0 binaries "out of the box" in 2.0.5, please consider stepping > ^^^^^ Hmmm. I could have sworn I also yelled about it in 2.1 - I just blindly took the first one the search engine handed me without really looking at it. So much for supporting my case! :-) > My research suggests that we need the following libs from 2.0-RELEASE in > a compat20.tgz dist: > > libforms.so.2.0 > libncurses.so.2.0 > libdialog.so.2.0 > libg++.so.2.0 > libreadline.so.2.0 > > That's it! OK, what do you think of the compat20.tgz sitting in my home directory on freefall? I supposed we could easily blap it on top of the old one in the release tree as well and save a lot of future 2.1 installers a lot of potential trouble, but we should consider the tech support impact of having "old" and "new" compat20 files also. Gah. Thoughts? Jordanhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22917.821094791>