Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:58:01 -0800 (PST) From: Nicole <nicole@unixgirl.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: FW: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Message-ID: <XFMail.010105005801.nicole@unixgirl.com> Resent-Message-ID: <20010105084920.5D1AA20F0D@krell.webweaver.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format
--_=XFMail.1.4.0.FreeBSD:010105005801:304=_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
-----FW: <20010105084920.5D1AA20F0D@krell.webweaver.net>-----
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 00:49:20 -0800 (PST)
From: (Mail Delivery System) <MAILER-DAEMON@webweaver.net>
To: nicole@unixgirl.com
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
This is the Postfix program at host krell.webweaver.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please contact <postmaster@webweaver.net>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the message returned below.
The Postfix program
<tom@sdf.com>: host misery.sdf.com[204.244.213.49] said: 550-untestable -
above.net has multiple open relays and has blocked the ORBS tester. 550
rejected: administrative prohibition
I'm sorry.. But this really put Orbs on my idiots list. They are blocking mail
from any server colocated at above.net? Hello?
Nicole
--------------End of forwarded message-------------------------
nicole@unixgirl.com |\ __ /| (`\ http://www.unixgirl.com/
webmistress@dangermouse.org | o_o |__ ) ) http://www.dangermouse.org/
nicole@deviantimages.com // \\ http://www.deviantimages.com/
---------------------------(((---(((----------------------------------------
-- Powered by Coka-Cola and FreeBSD --
-- I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble --
-- Back Up My Hard Drive? I Can't Find The Reverse Switch! --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--_=XFMail.1.4.0.FreeBSD:010105005801:304=_
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Received: from xwin.nmhtech.com (xwin.daemontech.net [208.138.46.161])
by krell.webweaver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8EF9320F04; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 00:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Content-Length: 2594
Message-ID: <XFMail.010105004915.nicole@unixgirl.com>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10101042314330.15269-100000@misery.sdf.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Sender: altera@xwin.nmhtech.com
From: Nicole <nicole@unixgirl.com>
To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with fxp0 card and slowing/dying transmits
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
On 05-Jan-01 Tom Samplonius wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Nicole wrote:
>
> ...
>> The problem is that when trying to scp a file or send a large file to it
>> via
>> sendmail, (large = 253952 <a copy of sendmail>) it seems to transmit along
>> happily, then (at least for scp) at abt 1/2 way through, it seems to just
>> start
>> crawling. When I have let it run, it will go forever and will seem to
>> eventually finish but will hang as the transfer speed keeps dropping through
>> the
>> floor.
> ...
>
> Mismatched duplex settings can cause problems like this. When using a
> switch, duplex settings on your server and switch must match. Most
> FreeBSD ethernet card drivers default to autonegotiation, but can be
> changed with an ifconfig option. Auto negotiation may not be trustworthy
> as it requires a good and recent switch, and a good and recent card. You
> should verify that autonegotiation actually picks the right duplex setting
> before trusting it with your hardware. Auto negotation requires that both
> the server and switch are set to auto. "auto negotation" is not the same
> as "auto detect".
>
> And hubs are always half-duplex.
>
> Tom
Yup.... Set to 100/TX via ifconfig -
Ifconfig -a shows:
fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
media: 100baseTX status: active
supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX
10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP
The switch is showing: 100Mbps/Half/BP-Off
As opposed to another server on the same switch, set to auto.
ifconfig -a
media: autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active
supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX
10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP
The switch shows: 100Mbps/Full/Enabled (IEEE 802.3x)
Hmm Even if I force the switch to full duplex it does not seem to change the
server to full duplex when using autonegotiate via ifconfig.. What is the
right syntax to force full neg via ifconfig?
Nicole
nicole@unixgirl.com |\ __ /| (`\ http://www.unixgirl.com/
webmistress@dangermouse.org | o_o |__ ) ) http://www.dangermouse.org/
nicole@deviantimages.com // \\ http://www.deviantimages.com/
---------------------------(((---(((----------------------------------------
-- Powered by Coka-Cola and FreeBSD --
-- I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble --
-- Back Up My Hard Drive? I Can't Find The Reverse Switch! --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--_=XFMail.1.4.0.FreeBSD:010105005801:304=_--
End of MIME message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.010105005801.nicole>