Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:44:48 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no> Cc: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <20151111184448.GR31314@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <86io58flhk.fsf@desk.des.no> References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <56428E8A.3090201@FreeBSD.org> <56428F59.5010908@FreeBSD.org> <86y4e47uty.fsf@desk.des.no> <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org> <86r3jwfpiq.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151111181339.GE48728@zxy.spb.ru> <86io58flhk.fsf@desk.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:18:31PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> writes: > > Can you explain what is problem? > > Radical suggestion: read the first email in the thread. I am read and don't understund (you talk about trouble of maintaining the HPN patches). I see patched version in ports. This version maintaining. What is problem? Differnt openssh? Quality of patches? Different branches? ports branch is worse (by some reaason) base branch? > > PS: As I today know, kerberos heimdal is practicaly dead as opensource > > project. Have FreeBSD planed switch to MIT Kerberos? I am know about > > security/krb5. > > We switched from MIT to Heimdal at some point in the past for some > reason I don't remember. MIT and Heimdal are *not* interchangeable at I think because MIT stop development in the past. > the source or binary level, so switching back is not trivial. I am know about this.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151111184448.GR31314>