Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:47:38 -0700 From: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net> To: Thomas Arnold <tom@inna.net> Cc: Doug Russell <drussell@saturn-tech.com>, Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, Stephen Roome <steve@visint.co.uk>, Dave Alderman <dave@persprog.com>, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? Message-ID: <199704160747.AAA04872@MindBender.serv.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 15 Apr 97 23:46:25 -0400. <Pine.BSI.3.95.970415233558.10274B-100000@caught.inna.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>On Tue, 15 Apr 1997, Doug Russell wrote:
>> Oh... By the way. Has anyone done any benchmarks on the K6 chips under
>> FreeBSD yet? If not, let me know what tests you all want done on one,
[...]
>Gee. Ask and ye shall receive!
[K6-166 only stats deleted]
That's nice, but can you post a competative comparison against
something else? The stats do nothing for me all by themselves.
Thanks.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net
--< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >--
NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3,
Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32...
NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704160747.AAA04872>