Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 08:59:17 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc34 Makefile Message-ID: <20040317165917.GA92743@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040317114028.GA62685@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200403170818.i2H8IFYU008824@repoman.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0403171036060.94079@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0403171135480.94079@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20040317112344.GB86662@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040317114028.GA62685@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 03:40:29AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Do you have additional bsd.port.mk patches in your tree?
Not on this FreeBSD/i386 machine -- I try very hard to keep it a clean,
virgin reference system.
I'm testing a build on it again.
> The comment
> in your commit log about bsd.port.mk now using a different default
> value of CONFIGURE_TARGET seemed odd to me - there were patches
> proposed to change this, but they were never committed because they
> broke a lot of ports.
Actually they were committed. :-)
----------------------------
revision 1.398
date: 2002-02-21 18:24:20; author: obrien; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3
Fix the default CONFIGURE_TARGET to one that is a proper GNU tuple.
Approved by: several portmgr members
----------------------------
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040317165917.GA92743>