Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:33:32 +0100 From: Lennart Augustsson <lennart@augustsson.net> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@vicor.com> Subject: Re: USB vendore designations.. Message-ID: <41CBF07C.3040108@augustsson.net> In-Reply-To: <200412240430.iBO4UVMl050469@apollo.backplane.com> References: <41CB38A7.5020700@vicor.com> <200412240430.iBO4UVMl050469@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I would nnot consider the expanded definitions as progress. I would not apply the patch. I'm of the old school that thinks that even a few kB are worth saving. :) -- Lennart Matthew Dillon wrote: > :Lennart, Matt, Barry, USB hackers, > : > :On FreeBSD we have added vendor descriptiosn fo teh form > :XYZ electrical corp. > : > :where on NetBSD the same ID may be described as "XYZ" > : > :Is there a reason to go one way or the other? > :I'd rather not be different for no reason, but I'm loath to > :just discard information. > : > :thoughts? > > Well, the expanded definitions could be defined as 'progress', so I'd > probably stick with them and maybe submit a patch back to NetBSD to > bring NetBSD in synch with the better names. > > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > <dillon@backplane.com> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41CBF07C.3040108>