Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:00:16 +0900 From: Keiichi SHIMA <keiichi@iij.ad.jp> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPV6/KAME/protosw integration cleanup Message-ID: <86elqf15z3.wl@keiichi01.osaka.iij.ad.jp> In-Reply-To: <3B777442.59D83AC4@elischer.org> References: <4246.997609202@itojun.org> <y7v7kw8or55.wl@condor.jinmei.org> <3B777442.59D83AC4@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > I tend to agree with itojun. Although I understand FreeBSD guys want > > to make code from KAME cleaner in terms of FreeBSD's own point of > > view, it will make future merge from KAME to FreeBSD harder. This is > > a trade-off issue, but at this moment, I think we'll still need > > further merge from KAME to FreeBSD, so I'd prefer keeping the code "as > > is" for a while. > > Although I understand KAME guys want > to make code from KAME cleaner in terms of KAME's own point of > view, it will make future merge from Almost anywhere else to FreeBSD harder. Let us express that KAME code is designed for all the *BSDs. We don't have enough resources to arrange KAME code for each BSD as they want to be. Althogh I understand your point that some parts of KAME code is not a FreeBSD's manner, but currentry, this is the best compromise to support all the BSDs with minimum efforts. Please understand our approach... --- Keiichi SHIMA <keiichi@iij.ad.jp> IIJ Research Laboratory / KAME project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86elqf15z3.wl>