Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 03:40:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.columbia.edu> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.columbia.edu>, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: announcing stackable file system templates and code generator Message-ID: <200005090740.DAA04200@shekel.mcl.cs.columbia.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 09 May 2000 00:34:47 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005090033010.82041-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005090033010.82041-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>, Kris Kennaway writes: > On Tue, 9 May 2000, Erez Zadok wrote: > > > No I don't, as I never tried it on top of one of those. I mostly tried on > > top of regular ffs mounted directories. Can you try that to see if the > > problems go away? It'll help me narrow down the problem. Tnx. > > Well, I feel stupid. These are *stacking* FSes, duh. I was trying to > mount_foofs on a device (/dev/vn1c), not over a UFS-mounted directory. > > I've just tried that (over a UFS on a vn) and rot13fs at least seems to > work fine. > > Kris > > ---- > In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. > -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu> It would be excellent news to know that my 4.0 templates work with minor changes on 5.0. Do me a favor and try my standard test case on rot13fs or cryptfs: unpack and build the latest am-utils (or emacs, or your favorite large compile job) inside the stacked f/s. If it passes a few runs, it's most likely ok. Thanks, Erez. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005090740.DAA04200>