Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:43:55 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r239568 - head/etc/rc.d Message-ID: <503687FB.5020301@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120822222511.GD78670@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <201208221835.q7MIZI77076855@svn.freebsd.org> <50355121.3070408@FreeBSD.org> <20120822222511.GD78670@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/22/2012 3:25 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:37:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Were these changes discussed somewhere and I missed it?
>
> They were not discussed. I did not see the need.
>
> This is simple functionality. If securelevel is raised > 0, one
> cannot start up a firewall nor make major changes to time.
> Thus these components are required to be done before raising securelevel.
>
>
>> I'm not opposed per se, but the security aspects should be discussed on
>> freebsd-security@,
>
> I'm sorry, I didn't feel that ensuring the software follows the
> published specification of its functionality to have such a security
> aspect.
>
>> and it's preferable that significant changes to
>> rcorder be looked at on freebsd-rc@ as well.
>
> I don't consider this to be a significant change.
>
> I do have some significant changes that I do want freebsd-rc@ to
> review I will be sending soon.
>
>> Can you hold off on MFC'ing any of this until it's been reviewed more
>> thoroughly?
>
> Yes.
Thanks. Just to reiterate, I'm not saying that either your changes or
your methodology were wrong ... I personally would just like a little
time to review them before we move forward.
Doug
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
I can do.
-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503687FB.5020301>