Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 05:15:29 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc toplev.c Message-ID: <20020622050504.U5440-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200206211821.g5LILU333022@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, David E. O'Brien wrote: > obrien 2002/06/21 11:21:30 PDT > > Modified files: > contrib/gcc toplev.c > Log: > cc -O0 and -O1 didn't do the easy optimization of alignment for space. > Instead it attempted to do the easy optimization of alignment for time, > which should be to 1-byte alignment on i386's. > > Submitted by: bde Urk, I seem to have mangled my N-tuple negatives there. -O0 and -O1 actually optimized alignment for space, but they should optimize alignment for time like they used to. Optimization for space should give 1-byte alignment on i386's, but doesn't quite. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020622050504.U5440-100000>