Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 01:18:53 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: David Xu <davidxu@viatech.com.cn> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PTHREADED -> P_SA Message-ID: <20030614081853.GD5563@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <002901c33242$1b47da70$0701a8c0@tiger> References: <20030614064617.5FD8837B404@hub.freebsd.org> <002901c33242$1b47da70$0701a8c0@tiger>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 02:56:36PM +0800, David Xu wrote: > > > I will rename flag P_THREADED to P_SA in kernel, any objections ? > > here is the patch: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/P_SA.diff > > > > It's only semantics.. > > but it's been changes before.. is this the final name? > > Yes, I think it should be final. P_THREADED says more than P_SA for someone who's not intimate with the code. I for one don't know what SA stands for, but apparently it's some kind of threading model/implementation if I can believe the comments. In that case I don't know what's so wrong about P_THREADED. So, why is P_SA better than P_THREADED? -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030614081853.GD5563>