Date: 08 Apr 2001 15:39:54 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/pseudofs pseudofs.c pseudofs.h pseudofs_fileno.c pseudofs_internal.h pseudofs_vncache.c pseudofs_vnops.c Message-ID: <xzpbsq7bjdh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Sun, 08 Apr 2001 13:40:54 %2B0200" References: <97381.986730054@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: > In message <xzpsnjjbtc7.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > It supplies a common framework for procfs, linprocfs and other similar > > fs'es (e.g. kernfs, if we hadn't nuked it). > So basically the "UFS" off pseudo-FS's ? I don't know the fs system well enough to fully understand your question. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpbsq7bjdh.fsf>