Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:52:20 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 211361] suggested boot partition size is too small, bsdinstall creates unaligned partitions
Message-ID:  <bug-211361-8-ucupDVBYbB@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-211361-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-211361-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211361

--- Comment #15 from Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Dag-Erling Sm=C3=83=C2=B8rgrav from comment #14)

gpart(8) does know about those things and will align to stripesize -- the l=
ogic
in the installer is copied from the userland code in geom_part.c. And the
installer doesn't know about CHS. The stripe size, in geom, is the canonical
mechanism for recommending IO alignment. Why do we want to break that?

The only partitioning policy choices the installer makes are those involved=
 in
making the system bootable on the given platform (where the bootloader goes=
, in
particular, and which partition schemes are bootable). It tries *very* hard=
 not
to do anything else and, in particular, not to second guess defaults. I wou=
ld
like to keep it that way.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-211361-8-ucupDVBYbB>