Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 23:26:30 -0500 From: David Rhodus <drhodus@catpa.com> To: Ryan Sommers <ryans@gamersimpact.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-BETA: giving up on 4 buffers (ata) Message-ID: <3FC57CF6.7040805@catpa.com> In-Reply-To: <20031127040819.9774.qmail@neuroflux.com> References: <20031126183744.GA9140@merlin.emma.line.org> <20031127044934.K26615@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> <20031126190344.GA34173@ussenterprise.ufp.org> <20031127040819.9774.qmail@neuroflux.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ryan Sommers wrote: >> >> I'll also note in my FreeBSD current debugging of some drivers it was >> about a 50/50 shot as to if this would happen. Having to fsck every >> other reboot was only made less painful by the background fsck thing. > > > Don't some BIOS' protect the superblocks as a kind of "virus > protection"? Could this be related to them? No. -DR
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FC57CF6.7040805>