Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:12:08 +0100 From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Cc: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@FreeBSD.org> Subject: linux libusb again, I made an updated port... Message-ID: <20140207201208.GA59695@enceladus10.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! This came up on irc so I tried to build a linux libusb port (before I learned about ports/146895), mine uses linux_base-gentoo-stage3 like linux_kdump with a src/lib/libusb head snapshot so it's more up to date than wkoszek's build (ports/146895), and it's really easy to update it again. Also maybe it can be used as linux libusb-1.0.so too; I didn't actually test it tho. Should this be committed? Is wkoszek's version better since it also builds on < 10.x? Comments welcome... wkoszek's version: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146895 Mine: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/linux_libusb.shar Distfile: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/distfiles/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.tar.bz2 10/amd64 package: http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/tmp/packages/10amd64/linux_libusb-11.0r261448.txz (built via: poudriere bulk -v -j 10amd64 -p custom devel/linux_libusb - btw for some reason the dependency emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 doesn't build for 10i386 in poudriere bulk, I get a pkg segfault. bapt Cc'd...) Thanx, Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140207201208.GA59695>