Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 18:18:21 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: gnn@freebsd.org, freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Creation of a new list for Embedded.... Message-ID: <20060621181745.S35462@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060621170045.GB15163@soaustin.net> References: <m21wtlsszn.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20060619115827.A25435@wonkity.com> <m2veqwflzi.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20060621155727.E8526@fledge.watson.org> <20060621170045.GB15163@soaustin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Mark Linimon wrote: > well, the question is, do discussions about picobsd, nanobsd, etc., which > may not be intended for what I would consider "embedded systems", move over > as well? > > If so, IMHO there ought to be one list. I can see arguments for either > choice. I think centralizing discussions on this one list make sense also, at least until such time as it's clear there's enough traffic to justify breaking it out. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060621181745.S35462>