Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 20:48:17 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r204650 - head/share/man/man9 Message-ID: <20100303194817.GK8200@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <201003031413.20685.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <201003031849.o23InFJU034484@svn.freebsd.org> <20100303190551.GJ8200@hoeg.nl> <201003031413.20685.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--9RHkgBN4Ly9iZsmR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Maybe I'm flogging a dead horse, but this is 2010. Whether or not a > > compiler supports C99 is no longer an issue. We're already far beyond > > the point of going back to C89. >=20 > The point is that if you look at almost all of the new-bus drivers in the= =20 > tree, they do not use C99 initializers to initialize their KOBJ class. > Given that, I do not see a reason to make driver(9) document a style that > almost no drivers use. If we did want to do something different, we > should use the DEFINE_CLASS_0() macro that can be used to declare a KOBJ > class. That sounds like a good argument. Thanks for explaining! --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --9RHkgBN4Ly9iZsmR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuOvQEACgkQ52SDGA2eCwVKigCeNHLcm18kzFrxtjU9lpsZrEII kdUAnj7nTh+1KI4NGXC11CymHCOSqzl3 =STNf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9RHkgBN4Ly9iZsmR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100303194817.GK8200>