Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:29:53 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly <tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net> To: Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: GTK vs QT Message-ID: <420991C1.2030808@taborandtashell.net> In-Reply-To: <ef60af09050208195068c1798e@mail.gmail.com> References: <ef60af090502081934648df9fa@mail.gmail.com> <1107920345.41909.2.camel@codegurus.org> <ef60af09050208195068c1798e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gert Cuykens wrote: > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker <mwalker@codegurus.org> wrote: > >>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back >>it up? > > > because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :) > > no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around > on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so. I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?420991C1.2030808>