Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 23:43:28 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, des@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review Message-ID: <3C4BC6A0.4078CBA6@mindspring.com> References: <20020120233050.GA26913@nagual.pp.ru> <200201202344.g0KNijt34738@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Murray wrote: > > Yes. And to allow PAM stack to make right decision, pam_opie pass special > > information to PAM stack. Look at the patch, pam_opie not breaks from the > > stack by yourself, it is /etc/pam* do that using information from > > pam_opie. > > Sure - but you are making specialised use of the return value that > assumes that pam_opie will be followed by pam_unix. This violates > the PAM spec. Cool discussion. Once you guys have this all hammered out, are you going to integrate PAM and Kerberos? 8-) 8-) 8-). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C4BC6A0.4078CBA6>