Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:48:45 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: pgj@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, gabor@kovesdan.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, simon@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide article.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng article.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/policies chapter.sgml Message-ID: <20080822044845.32c78713.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080822.160835.262777180.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <48A75B1A.7060809@FreeBSD.org> <20080817.204750.78468138.hrs@allbsd.org> <20080818153942.GH1172@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20080822.160835.262777180.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:08:35 +0900 (JST) Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> wrote > in <20080818153942.GH1172@zaphod.nitro.dk>: > > si> I have no general problem with merging www and doc closer (might be > si> done while considering moving to svn?) and fully requiring having both > si> for build of either, but having e.g. www/en as a deep subdir of doc/ > si> seems like a rather bad idea to me. > si> > si> The web site and and doc/ are rather differnet beast wrt. how you > si> write content so I see no problem having it in seperate top level > si> directories. > > I agree with characteristics of www and doc are different from each > other, but I personally feel there is almost no difference between > having them in two separated dirs and having them in a dir. The > reason why I like to have www in a subdir of doc is only for simplify > the current build complexity due to the separated repos, so I am > wondering how other people feel for having www in a subdir like > doc/<lang>/htdocs. I'm in favor. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080822044845.32c78713.trhodes>