Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:31:51 +0000 From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 34815 for review Message-ID: <20030722093151.GC58118@technokratis.com> In-Reply-To: <200307220347.h6M3lZea038684@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200307220347.h6M3lZea038684@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:47:35PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=34815 > > Change 34815 by peter@peter_hammer on 2003/07/21 20:47:23 > > mb_alloc and mb_free are way too big to inline They're only inlined in some local routines. Some care was taken to keep the local routines' size not too bad by only inlining them in there once or twice at worse. In retrospect, though, this could have been done better, but out-of-lining them is not the best solution. P.S.: How expensive, relatively, is a function call on the hammer? I seem to recall the alpha had a relatively higher cost (when compared to i386) for typical function calls. -- Bosko Milekic * bmilekic@technokratis.com * bmilekic@FreeBSD.org TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030722093151.GC58118>