Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 01:31:04 +0100 From: Tomasz Paszkowski <ns88@k.pl> To: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procfs Message-ID: <20001219013104.A59523@genesis.k.pl> In-Reply-To: <20001218191344.B5569@databits.net>; from petef@databits.net on Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 07:13:44PM -0500 References: <20001219003737.C2567@genesis.k.pl> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012181543040.86293-100000@mail.isppro.net> <20001219005756.A25653@genesis.k.pl> <20001218191344.B5569@databits.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 07:13:44PM -0500, Pete Fritchman wrote: But by using kern.ps_showallprocs MIB you can limit information about proccess table to those entires, which are owned by caller pid. Why it can't by done with procfs ? -- _ _ _ _ _ / \ | | / / / \ / \ --- Tomasz Paszkowski ------------------------------ | |\ \| | \ \ |/ \||/ \| === IPv4://3575244866 === IPNg://3ffe:8010:59::2 === /_/ \__/ /_/ \_/ \_/ ---------------------------- ( 2B | ~ 2B ) == FF --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001219013104.A59523>