Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:54:57 -0800 From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Cc: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Subject: Re: Upcoming Releases Message-ID: <DBC62E3B-B07D-4A3F-AD22-E3EB62484725@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <DE7BAC1A-0B40-4B2A-861A-6AE7B16FAC0D@lafn.org> References: <EEFD0376-2038-4801-9A7A-BF342B66F029@lafn.org> <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> <DE7BAC1A-0B40-4B2A-861A-6AE7B16FAC0D@lafn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 7 March 2016, at 16:23, Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> wrote: >=20 >=20 > What I was hoping to find was some form of informal, preliminary = version of the release notes or announcements for 10.3 and 11. I seem = to recall some sort of discussion of that back when the decision was = made to drop bind from the base. I wasn't able to find it though. I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely to = have the new packetized base feature. That tells me that 11.0 is most = likely to be dicey to work with. I am reminded when the new pkg system = came out and the supporting servers were compromised. It caused me a = lot of issues. I still have one production server I can't upgrade the = ports as its setup for the temporary solution. I can't recall what I = changed and making it look like the working systems doesn't help. Thus, = I will skip 11.0 and wait for the dust from that to settle. I'll be = upgrading to 10.3 in June.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DBC62E3B-B07D-4A3F-AD22-E3EB62484725>