Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:11:18 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: atrens@nortel.ca, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: possibly related data point - (was) Re: Current Broken! Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012110003140.714-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.001208092345.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > On 08-Dec-00 atrens@nortel.ca wrote: > > > > John, > > > > I'm not a constraints expert either, but I noticed that when I try to > > build a kernel WITHOUT any optimization, I get a failure in > > > > /usr/src/sys/i386/atomic.h . > > Compiling a kernel with anything but -O for optimization is not supported. gcc > has produced buggy code for the -O0 case in the past. -O0 (or plain cc without -O) is supposed to work, but no one cares enough about it to fix it every day. Fixing <machine/atomic.h> has been pending for many days now. My oldest saved mail about it is dated 21 July 2000, but ISTR discussing it last year. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0012110003140.714-100000>