Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:02:55 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Installing 9.1 without re-partitioning hard drive Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303191402040.93137@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <1363620549.604.85.camel@archlinux> References: <20130317153744.DEQ57782@ms5.mc.surewest.net> <1363594543.1496.69.camel@archlinux> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303180859370.17241@wonkity.com> <1363620549.604.85.camel@archlinux>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:00 -0600, Warren Block wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> Standard practice for this list is to Cc the responder and the list, >> because people are not required to subscribe to post. > > That makes sense and does explain why my last mail came through the > list, while my broken MUA didn't use the address, I used to subscribe to > this list. So a smarter MUA should provide different reply settings for > replying to different lists. I should take a look at the mailman > settings, since at the moment I receive 2 mails in case of Cc'ing, IIRC > this can be disabled. Mailing list settings may not help, since it's really up to the sender. But it's easy to filter out duplicates with maildrop or procmail.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1303191402040.93137>