Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:21:27 -0800 From: Sandy Rutherford <sandy@krvarr.bc.ca> To: Tim Erlin <listmail@filn.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache+SSL, which port? Message-ID: <16896.21831.300289.644962@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> In-Reply-To: <41FE9420.3080806@filn.net> References: <41FE7592.9070305@freebsd.org> <3f8e4a7a7af495009ace9a59c728a74a@mac.com> <41FE7B67.5070906@freebsd.org> <200501311306.41445.andrewgould@datawok.com> <41FE9420.3080806@filn.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:25:04 -0600, >>>>> Tim Erlin <listmail@filn.net> said: > Andrew L. Gould wrote: >> Not necessarily. I've heard lots of complaints about PHP and Apache2 >> not "playing nice". (Does anyone have any updates on this situation?) > I've been running apache2 with squirrelmail for a while. The biggest > problems were performance issues. Squirrelmail was very slow pulling > mail from the disk. Not sure that apache13 would help there. I too have been using apache2 + SSL with SquirrelMail. I have had no problems --- performance or otherwise. Are you sure that your performance issues are really a PHP issue and not a problem with your IMAP server? Do you see the same problems if you use a different IMAP client? ...Sandy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16896.21831.300289.644962>