Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 20:02:20 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts doFS.sh Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103091955120.900-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200103090406.f2946Bs04692@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Warner Losh wrote: > [[ I want to get the reason for this in the archives ]] > > In message <200103090103.f2913GQ88940@freefall.freebsd.org> "David E. O'Brien" writes: > : newfs with `-m 1' > : > : This is needed even with `-o space' as the kernel decides to be "helpful" > : and not really do space optimization. Why `-m 1' instead of `-m 0'? This change seems to have no effect. There was already a `tunefs -m 0' on the next line of doFS.sh, and the change doesn't remove it. Setting -m in a separate command was just inefficient. Now it is bogus. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0103091955120.900-100000>