Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 12:11:23 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rsync/files ssh-patch-main.c ssh-patch-rsync.h Message-ID: <3AD17CBB.4598E8B@FreeBSD.org> References: <200104081548.f38FmTf80209@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David E. O'Brien" wrote: > obrien 2001/04/08 08:48:29 PDT > > Modified files: > net/rsync/files ssh-patch-rsync.h > Added files: > net/rsync/files ssh-patch-main.c > Log: Isn't patchfile should begin with "patch-" prefix? What is the reason here for breaking good (and very reasonable, IMO) convention for patchnames? -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AD17CBB.4598E8B>