Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:36:47 +0200 From: Willie Viljoen <will@unfoldings.net> To: dick hoogendijk <dick@nagual.st>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libvorvisfile.la vanished? Message-ID: <200302231136.47622.will@unfoldings.net> In-Reply-To: <20030223091658.GA8781@nagual.st> References: <20030223085119.GA7748@nagual.st> <200302231107.01488.will@unfoldings.net> <20030223091658.GA8781@nagual.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It depends what you want to do really. If you are upgrading something which has very little dependancies, and on which very little depends, portupgrade <package> will do, but for anything that is so interdependant as KDE, -rR is a must. Will On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:16, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 23 Feb Willie Viljoen wrote: > > Try portupgrade -rR kdegames :) > > I will.. > Can it be _this_ simple? > > This leads me to another question: > Is there a *right* syntax to use "portupgrade" for most cases? > > I mean: portupgrade <package> is not enough most of the time (?) > Or do I have to use different options in all kind of different > situations? :-(( -- Willie Viljoen Freelance IT Consultant 214 Paul Kruger Avenue, Universitas Bloemfontein 9321 South Africa +27 51 522 15 60 +27 51 522 44 36 (after hours) +27 82 404 03 27 (mobile) will@unfoldings.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302231136.47622.will>