Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:46:40 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ps on 4.0-current Message-ID: <199911241746.KAA21366@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 Nov 1999 18:29:30 %2B0100." <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <35709.943464570@critter.freebsd.dk> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : So please explain the logic you want implemented once people have : stopped haggeling about it, it is rather trivial. OK. I'll likely state what I'd like to see as a patch. : I pressume we want the same policy for /proc/*/cmdline as for the : sysctl ps(1) uses ? Yes. I'll firm this up later today and send an exact proposal out so we can kill this. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911241746.KAA21366>