Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 20:10:40 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Michael Reifenberger <root@totum.plaut.de> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: divert still broken? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970506201004.4479n-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970506112726.15899A-100000@totum.plaut.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 6 May 1997, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > > > So the choices are: > > > deny : be silent > > > reject: send ICMP !H > > > reset : send RST > > > > Sounds OK with me.. any body else care to comment? > > In this case wouldn't match the keyword drop better than deny? Maybe. But it is better to keep the backward compatibility. Dannyhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970506201004.4479n-100000>