Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 06:42:36 -0400 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r257109 - head/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver Message-ID: <7DCDC9F2-776B-41AC-B34F-8A5144A4AF0D@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <2DE0EA95F6944DB28D4B2F03EEF582F8@multiplay.co.uk> References: <201310250909.r9P990nk083926@svn.freebsd.org> <BFE9444E-33F8-438E-AC49-FF20101AECF2@andric.com> <2DE0EA95F6944DB28D4B2F03EEF582F8@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Oct 2013, at 06:03, "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: > As discussed on IRC while I agree removing CC is possibly the better > fix moving forward, I think removing /usr/bin/CC has quite a bit more > risk, especially at this stage in the release phase of 10. I'm not sure what the risk is. CC is an IRIXism that was never part of any standard. Linux distros don't seem to provide a CC, just a c++, so this is unlikely to cause problems with ported code. We've discussed removing CC for a while, and I think it's the right call. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7DCDC9F2-776B-41AC-B34F-8A5144A4AF0D>