Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 06:42:36 -0400 From: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> To: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r257109 - head/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver Message-ID: <7DCDC9F2-776B-41AC-B34F-8A5144A4AF0D@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <2DE0EA95F6944DB28D4B2F03EEF582F8@multiplay.co.uk> References: <201310250909.r9P990nk083926@svn.freebsd.org> <BFE9444E-33F8-438E-AC49-FF20101AECF2@andric.com> <2DE0EA95F6944DB28D4B2F03EEF582F8@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Oct 2013, at 06:03, "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> = wrote: > As discussed on IRC while I agree removing CC is possibly the better > fix moving forward, I think removing /usr/bin/CC has quite a bit more > risk, especially at this stage in the release phase of 10. I'm not sure what the risk is. CC is an IRIXism that was never part of = any standard. Linux distros don't seem to provide a CC, just a c++, so = this is unlikely to cause problems with ported code. =20 We've discussed removing CC for a while, and I think it's the right = call. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7DCDC9F2-776B-41AC-B34F-8A5144A4AF0D>