Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:59:16 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: usb@FreeBSD.org, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP new usb code coming in. Message-ID: <48AB4234.80502@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.1.10.0808192215440.62454@fledge.watson.org> References: <20080819194413.GB16977@elvis.mu.org> <48AB32D4.5040904@FreeBSD.org> <48AB3408.4030703@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.1.10.0808192215440.62454@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>> Alfred Perlstein wrote: >>>> Q. Can we change the name from "usb2_" to my favorite name? A. No. >>>> This is for a short period, stop being so annoying. >>> >>> Why not just "usb_"? You can then leave it as is then avoiding >>> violating POLA second time. Otherwise people would confuse it with >>> USB 2.0. >> >> P.S. I am talking about entries for kernel config here, not about >> names of directories and source files. > > With the move to Subversion, there's a significantly lower technical > barrier to renaming files in the tree, especially if they exist only in > HEAD. Let's assume that, when the time comes to remove the old USB > implementation, we will do whatever renaming of directories, files, and > symbols that may make sense. That is to say, let's leave the names as-is > and focus on the semantics. See my other e-mail. I am talking about entries for kernel config here, not about names of directories and source files. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48AB4234.80502>