Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:42:19 +0200
From:      Niclas Zeising <zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se>
To:        Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Neel Chauhan <neel@neelc.org>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, Evilham <contact@evilham.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: DRM-current-kmod is still a problem at r353339
Message-ID:  <29e29759-18bc-6747-ab11-e15eea4ac738@daemonic.se>
In-Reply-To: <96d8f37a-179b-ecad-62d1-5a097d30c0ed@daemonic.se>
References:  <CAGudoHE755ig7KGuzq8uNY01K2Jcf-MKBjCp8kbpJAoiHdbQMA@mail.gmail.com> <99c89ca0-462c-f4c7-fa07-6f61e9d39d66@acm.org> <f2e7c4b4c236ee694f277d78479cb6ee@neelc.org> <CAGudoHGwmp=vNwOy2W22rjx_mQj1nkbdYzuLfayM7O0vn4keeA@mail.gmail.com> <bb951f83-6a50-48ce-8efa-b8fa92a9840e@yggdrasil.evilham.com> <CAGudoHGoikyZudFSxYjypF8EL24BPxBTPQjAnCKTe%2Bvg3DJiWQ@mail.gmail.com> <bb4f31fcb7f06059f1d9fe391b119661@neelc.org> <3bb2e410-51dd-bc3f-7660-41a4683551b3@daemonic.se> <20191017195347.GB6447@raichu> <53ff1ac5-c7e8-1b6c-bd43-481eaef61120@daemonic.se> <20191017210510.GC6447@raichu> <96d8f37a-179b-ecad-62d1-5a097d30c0ed@daemonic.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2019-10-21 10:13, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> On 2019-10-17 23:05, Mark Johnston wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:31:12PM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>>> On 2019-10-17 21:53, markj@freebsd.org wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:03:51PM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>>>>> On 2019-10-16 18:57, Neel Chauhan wrote:
>>>>>> While drm-current-kmod worked for a little while, it broke with=20
>>>>>> r353645.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Q5nYZf2.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm using the same HP Spectre that I used earlier (where it worked=
=20
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> where it panicked).
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That commit looks unrelated, it touches the wbwd and superio driver=
s,
>>>>> nothing else.=C2=A0 Any chance you can bisect exactly which revisio=
n that
>>>>> caused the new issues?
>>>>
>>>> I believe it was the recent work on the vm page busy state, r353539
>>>> specifically.=C2=A0 This patch should fix it; we don't yet have a
>>>> __FreeBSD_version number bump on which to gate the patch.
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/linuxkpi/gplv2/src/linux_page.c=20
>>>> b/linuxkpi/gplv2/src/linux_page.c
>>>> index e2b85c45c..060ae85ed 100644
>>>> --- a/linuxkpi/gplv2/src/linux_page.c
>>>> +++ b/linuxkpi/gplv2/src/linux_page.c
>>>> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ retry:
>>>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 page =3D vm_page_lookup(devobj, i);
>>>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 if (page =3D=3D NULL)
>>>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 continue;
>>>> -=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =
if (vm_page_sleep_if_busy(page, "linuxkpi"))
>>>> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =
if (!vm_page_busy_acquire(page, VM_ALLOC_WAITFAIL))
>>>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 goto retry;
>>>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=
=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 cdev_pager_free_page(devobj, page);
>>>> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 }
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>> Hopefully someone can confirm that this patch to drm-current-kmod or
>>> drm-devel-kmod fixes the issue.=C2=A0 I won't be able to work on this=
 before
>>> the weekend at the earliest, I'm afraid.
>>> Mark, is it possible to get a belated version bump for this fix, and
>>> what changed to require it?
>>
>> I committed the bump and verified the patch on amdgpu.=C2=A0 Here are =
some
>> PRs for the drivers:
>>
>> https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm/pull/180
>> https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm/pull/181
>=20
> Hi!
> I'm working on getting this into the versions that are in ports.=C2=A0 =
For=20
> drm-current-kmod it's fairly simple, but for drm-devel-kmod there are=20
> unrelated changes which I need to check if they are ready to go in or=20
> not, so it will take some more time.
>=20
> Looking at the mail list thread, there seems to be a patch needed for=20
> base as well, has this been committed?

drm-devel-kmod and drm-current-kmod has been updated with the above fix.
If there are further issues, please let us know.
Regards
--=20
Niclas



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?29e29759-18bc-6747-ab11-e15eea4ac738>