Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 23:13:13 +1600 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: vince@apollo.COSC.GOV (-Vince-) Cc: jc@irbs.com, current@FreeBSD.org, FAQ@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1 update Message-ID: <199511010713.XAA21794@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951031212306.944Y@apollo.COSC.GOV> from "-Vince-" at Oct 31, 95 09:24:02 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> On Tue, 31 Oct 1995, John Capo wrote:
>
> I'll take a look at that so I don't really need to reinstall from
> floppies? Isn't the -current tree supposed to be newer than the -stable
> tree and will the -current tree become atleast 2.1?
think of it this way:
/---->2.1 /->2.2
/ /
1.0---->1.1---->1.1.5->X /---->2.0---->2.0.5---+----------+-->?
---- ^
BSD4.4--------------/ |
|
-current is presently HERE
I'm not sure if the next 'stabel'
release will be based on 2.1 or 2.2
but I draw it as being 2.2 here
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511010713.XAA21794>