Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:02:13 +0200 From: Vlad Galu <dudu@dudu.ro> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.2 and MPD5 stability issues Message-ID: <BANLkTimt%2B89Y=y1dCfgrSS_mJcKVYm7OjQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AD4DEA12-0598-4E87-A03A-667B380FAC4E@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <4d705cd0d73fb0d25cc3a017eb2eb072.squirrel@mail.stsnet.ro> <4E0A210F.7050105@sentex.net> <d3018670fab77332d6a6d996bd7fd79d.squirrel@mail.stsnet.ro> <1414962521.20110628215530@nitronet.pl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106282225560.82827@tapio.cksoft.de> <1722A449-718D-4403-A8F4-A3E733CD1518@lists.zabbadoz.net> <BANLkTi=cU97_10VCn08e94fMiF7kYO-Efw@mail.gmail.com> <AD4DEA12-0598-4E87-A03A-667B380FAC4E@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > > Perhaps it would be best to document what those particular workloads are. > Apparently, systems with small and seldom changing routing tables are good > candidates. However, the distinction is not immediately obvious by skimming > through the list archives. > > Start reading here: > http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2009/workshops/presto/papers/p37.pdf > > patches for documentation are surely welcome by the docs people. > > Thanks! That was a suggestion, though, not a request :) I'm one happy flowtable user. -- Good, fast & cheap. Pick any two.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTimt%2B89Y=y1dCfgrSS_mJcKVYm7OjQ>