Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:14:07 -0700
From:      John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To:        "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@watson.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_input.c
Message-ID:  <20060926041406.GE80527@funkthat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060925215235.C46437@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <200609260121.k8Q1Llo8049117@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060925215235.C46437@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew R. Reiter wrote this message on Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 21:53 -0400:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> 
> :jmg         2006-09-26 01:21:47 UTC
> :
> :  FreeBSD src repository
> :
> :  Modified files:
> :    sys/netinet          tcp_input.c 
> :  Log:
> :  fix calculating to_tsecr...  This prevents the rtt calculations from
> :  going all wonky...
> :  
> :  Revision  Changes    Path
> :  1.309     +1 -1      src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c
> 
> At some point will it be safe to remove that min/max check?  

Do you mean replace the else? or do you mean change it entirely?

Unless someone can think of a reason why the retransmit timer should
ever be allowed to go above 64 seconds, I'd consider replacing the
else, but as I see it, it prevents run away code, though w/o the
else I probably wouldn't of found this bug...

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579

     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060926041406.GE80527>