Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 12:58:51 -0400 From: Chris BeHanna <chris@pennasoft.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: data corruption with current (maybe sis chipset related?) Message-ID: <200305091258.51855.chris@pennasoft.com> In-Reply-To: <3EBB3C67.7F2E5CD8@mindspring.com> References: <20030508142234.GA1359@laptop.6bone.nl> <20030509010252.V73271@calis.blacksun.org> <3EBB3C67.7F2E5CD8@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 09 May 2003 01:28, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Don wrote:
> > > it's not really appropriate to -current any more. Bosko's is
> > > preferred, because it doesn't disclose the nature of the bug,
> >
> > How, exactly, is this preferred? :)
>
> It avoids a lawsuit.
Who would be the plaintiff, and what would be the basis of the
lawsuit?
And, why aren't Bosko's patches in the tree?
Thanks,
--
Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com
Principal Consultant
PennaSoft Corporation
chris@pennasoft.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305091258.51855.chris>