Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:16:51 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: ru@FreeBSD.org, bde@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>, Johan Karlsson <johan@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/chmod chmod.1 chmod.c Message-ID: <XFMail.20020918171651.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20020918233823.D15711-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18-Sep-2002 Bruce Evans wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Johan Karlsson wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 16:38 (-0700) +0000, Tom Rhodes wrote: >> > trhodes 2002/09/17 16:38:33 PDT >> > >> > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) >> > bin/chmod chmod.1 chmod.c >> > Log: >> > MFC: 'h' missing in getopt() call >> >> I'm still missing the functional change in rev 1.21 of chmod.c >> >> This cut-n-pasted part of that change has not yet been MFCed. > >> [Patch deleted] > >> Bruce, Ruslan, is this something that should be MFCed as well >> or do we only want to document the faked support for -h? > > Sigh; I thought the committed patch was to unbreak the unfaking of > the support. The correct fix would have been to back MFC of -current > bits that don't apply to RELENG_4 in rev.1.17.2.10. Agreed. We (re@) were given the impression the support was there just not in the usage, etc. Probably the code that was just MFC'd should just be backed out for now. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020918171651.jhb>